Which of the Following Was the Result in Welchert V

question 64

Multiple Choice

Which of the following was the result in Welchert v.American Cyanamid Inc.,the case in the text in which the plaintiffs claimed breach of an express warranty after herbicide manufactured by the defendant allegedly caused crop damage,and the issue was whether the Federal Insecticide,Fungicide,and Rodenticide Act preempted claims involving the product's label?

• A) The court ruled that the state law claim for breach of express warranty was preempted by FIFRA.
• B) The court ruled that the state law claim for breach of express warranty was not preempted by FIFRA.
• C) The court ruled that the portion of the state law claim for breach of express warranty was preempted only to the extent that it sought money damages as opposed to equitable relief.
• D) The court ruled that the portion of the state law claim for breach of express warranty was preempted only to the extent that it sought equitable relief as opposed to money damages.
• E) The court ruled that the state law claim for breach of express warranty was preempted only because it was not filed in a timely manner.

---

Definitions:

Immigration

the action of coming to live permanently in a foreign country.

American Indian Tribes

Indigenous peoples in the United States with distinct cultures, languages, and historical identities, recognized as sovereign entities by the federal government.

Massacre

The deliberate and brutal killing of a large number of people, typically those who are unable to defend themselves.

Disease

A disorder or malfunction of the mind or body that disrupts normal functioning, often characterized by specific signs and symptoms.