What Did the Court Rule in the Case of Hubbard

question 85

Multiple Choice

What did the court rule in the case of Hubbard v. UTZ Quality Foods, Inc., in which the buyer refused on the basis of color to accept potatoes that were the subject of an installment contract?

• A) That the failure to meet the proper color standard was not a substantial impairment.
• B) That the failure to meet the proper color standard was a substantial impairment but that it did not impair the contract.
• C) That the failure to meet the proper color standard amounted to a substantial impairment of the installments, substantially impairing the whole contract.
• D) That the refusal to accept the potatoes was made in bad faith.
• E) That the tendering of the potatoes was made in bad faith.

---

Definitions:

Opposing Traits

Characteristics in a personality that are contradictory or contrast directly with each other.

Rating Scale

A set of categories designed to elicit information about a quantitative or a qualitative attribute.

Likert-Type Scale

A psychometric scale often used in questionnaires, where respondents specify their level of agreement to a statement typically in a five or seven-point scale.

Empathic Responses

Emotional reactions that show an understanding of and compassion for another's situation, feelings, and motives.