Which of the Following Was the Result in Alexander V

question 48

Multiple Choice

Which of the following was the result in Alexander v.Lafayette Crime Stoppers Inc.,the case in the text in which the plaintiffs sued for collection of reward money offered to catch a serial killer by the defending publications,and the publications defended on the basis that the plaintiffs failed to provide notice as required by the reward offers because the plaintiffs provided relevant information to law enforcement,not the defendants?

• A) That the plaintiffs accepted the reward offers by performance when they provided information to law enforcement and were, therefore, entitled to recover.
• B) That the plaintiffs were entitled to prevail because by law they were required to contact law enforcement, not the defendants.
• C) That defendants did not receive acceptance of the reward offer and that, therefore, no contract was formed.
• D) That defendants revoked the reward offer before it was accepted and that, therefore, no contract was formed.
• E) That reward offers cannot constitute offers and that, therefore, no contract was formed.

---

Definitions:

Opinion Leader

An individual who influences others' attitudes or behaviors due to their expertise, knowledge, or position within a social network.

Initiator

An individual or entity that begins or triggers an action or process.

Informational Influence

The process where individuals change their opinions or behaviors to align with those of a group or society, based on the information or evidence presented by the group.

Utilitarian Influence

The impact of practical and functional benefits on consumer decision-making, emphasizing the utility and usefulness of a product or service.