Which of the Following Was the Result in In Re

question 24

Multiple Choice

Which of the following was the result in In Re Zappos.com Inc.,v.Customer Data Security Breach Litigation,the case in the text in which customers of Zappos claimed that they were not bound to an arbitration agreement contained in a contract with Zappos?

• A) The court ruled for the plaintiffs for the following two reasons: (1) there was no contract because plaintiffs did not assent to it, and (2) even if a contract existed, the contract was illusory and unenforceable because Zappos could avoid promises at any time.
• B) The court ruled for the plaintiffs only because of its finding that no contract existed based on the plaintiffs lack of assent.
• C) The court ruled for the plaintiffs only because of its finding that the contract was illusory and unenforceable because Zappos could avoid promises at any time.
• D) The court ruled in favor of Zappos on the basis that even though some provisions of the contract were unenforceable, because of the federal policy favoring arbitration agreements, the arbitration clause itself was enforceable.
• E) The court ruled in favor of Zappos on the basis that the contract was properly entered into and was fully enforceable.

---

Definitions:

Symbolic Play

A form of play in which children use objects, actions, or ideas to represent other objects, actions, or ideas, as a way of practicing and learning about their world.

Constructive Play

A type of play that involves creating or constructing something, typically allowing children to develop cognitive skills, problem-solving abilities, and hand-eye coordination.

Formal Games

Structured forms of play with predefined rules, often used in developmental psychology to study or enhance cognitive and social skills.

Play Styles

Different ways in which children engage in play, reflecting their personalities, preferences, and developmental stages.