When May a Court Rule That Parol Evidence Might Be

question 119

Multiple Choice

When may a court rule that parol evidence might be admissible to further the court's understanding of an agreement?

• A)When a court determines that a written agreement represents a complete and final version of the agreement.
• B)When a court determines that a written agreement does not represent a complete and final version of the agreement.
• C)When a court determines that there is disagreement between the parties over performance of the agreement.
• D)When a court determines that the plaintiff failed to do sufficient research to determine if signing the agreement was advisable.
• E)When a court determines that neither party failed to obtain counsel to determine if signing the agreement was advisable.

---

Definitions:

Commons Dilemma

A situation in which individuals' short-term self-interest conflicts with long-term group interest and well-being, typically regarding the overconsumption of a shared resource.

Scarce Resources

Goods or services that are limited in availability relative to the desires or needs of individuals or systems.

Competition

A situation where two or more parties strive for a goal that cannot be shared, such as a higher rank or prize.

Arteries Constricting

Arteries constricting refers to the narrowing of the arteries, which can reduce blood flow and increase blood pressure.