Compare and Contrast Marx,Weber,and Davis and Moore on How They

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Karl Marx, Max Weber, and Davis and Moore all have different perspectives on social stratification.

Marx viewed social stratification as a result of the capitalist mode of production, where the bourgeoisie (the ruling class) exploits the proletariat (the working class) for their own economic gain. He believed that this class conflict would eventually lead to a revolution and the establishment of a classless society.

Weber, on the other hand, believed that social stratification was not solely based on economic factors, but also on social status and political power. He identified three distinct dimensions of stratification: class, status, and party. Class refers to a person's economic position, status refers to their social prestige, and party refers to their political power. Weber also believed that social mobility was possible through the acquisition of education and skills.

Davis and Moore, in their functionalist perspective, argued that social stratification is necessary for the functioning of society. They believed that certain positions in society are more important and require more skill and training, and therefore should be rewarded with higher social and economic status. They also argued that social stratification motivates individuals to work hard and strive for success.

In summary, Marx viewed social stratification as a result of economic exploitation, Weber saw it as a combination of economic, social, and political factors, and Davis and Moore saw it as a necessary and functional aspect of society. Each perspective offers a different understanding of social stratification and its implications for society.

Compare and Contrast Marx,Weber,and Davis and Moore on How They

Definitions: