Is It Possible That Systematists Are Arguing Over Definitions That

question 33

Essay

Is it possible that systematists are arguing over definitions that cannot possibly reconcile the state of biological reality? Is it possible that there cannot be a single definition of a species simply because there are so many variables that must go into an encompassing definition? Wouldn't it be better to admit to the reality and adjust the reasoning to fit the reality rather than search for the "perfect" definition?

---

Definitions:

Indifference Curve

A graph showing different bundles of goods between which a consumer is indifferent, meaning that the consumer has no preference for one bundle over the other.

Apples

Commonly refers to the fruit of the apple tree, but in economic terms, it can represent a simple, tangible commodity for analysis.

Bananas

A fruit that is long and curved with a soft, sweet flesh covered by a yellow peel when ripe, commonly consumed worldwide.

Nuts

Typically refers to edible seeds enclosed in a hard shell, often considered both a source of nutrition and a staple in various cuisines.