Is It Possible That Systematists Are Arguing Over Definitions That

question 33

Essay

Is it possible that systematists are arguing over definitions that cannot possibly reconcile the state of biological reality? Is it possible that there cannot be a single definition of a species simply because there are so many variables that must go into an encompassing definition? Wouldn't it be better to admit to the reality and adjust the reasoning to fit the reality rather than search for the "perfect" definition?

---

Definitions:

Practice-Informed Research

Research that incorporates insights and experiences from practical application in a field to inform and enhance theoretical understanding and outcomes.

Research-Informed Practice

A practice in which decisions are made based on the best current scientific evidence, integrating professional wisdom with empirical research.

Respecting Individual's Right

Respecting an individual's right involves acknowledging and treating a person's legal, personal, and moral entitlements with honor and consideration in all circumstances.

Independent Decisions

Choices or judgments made by an individual based solely on their own considerations and judgement, without external influence or coercion.