What Is the Difference Between Moral Evil and Natural Evil

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Moral evil refers to the evil actions or choices made by human beings, such as murder, theft, or deception. Natural evil, on the other hand, refers to the suffering and harm caused by natural events or processes, such as earthquakes, diseases, or natural disasters.

The greater good defense argues that natural evil is necessary in order to bring about a greater good. This defense suggests that the suffering caused by natural evil ultimately leads to a greater good, such as personal growth, compassion, or the development of virtues. However, this defense can be problematic as it raises questions about the nature of the greater good and whether the suffering caused by natural evil is truly necessary for its attainment.

The free will defense, on the other hand, argues that natural evil is a result of the free will of human beings or other moral agents. This defense suggests that natural evil is a consequence of the choices made by free agents, and that without the possibility of natural evil, there would be no true freedom or moral responsibility. However, this defense can also be problematic as it raises questions about the extent of human or moral agency in causing natural evil, and whether it can fully account for the suffering caused by natural events.

In evaluating these defenses, it is clear that both the greater good defense and the free will defense have limitations in adequately handling the problem of natural evil. While they offer some explanations for the existence of natural evil, they do not fully address the extent of suffering and harm caused by natural events, and they raise questions about the nature of the greater good and the extent of human or moral agency in causing natural evil. Ultimately, the problem of natural evil remains a complex and challenging issue for philosophical and theological inquiry.

What Is the Difference Between Moral Evil and Natural Evil

Definitions: