Explain the Difference Between a Deductive Argument That Is Valid

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is A deductive argument that is valid means that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. In other words, the conclusion logically follows from the premises. An example of a deductive valid argument is:

Premise 1: All humans are mortal.
Premise 2: Socrates is a human.
Conclusion: Therefore, Socrates is mortal.

This argument is valid because if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. It is a valid deductive argument.

On the other hand, an inductive argument that is strong means that the premises provide strong support for the conclusion, but it does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion. An example of an inductively strong argument is:

Premise 1: Every time I have eaten strawberries, they have been sweet.
Conclusion: Therefore, the next strawberry I eat will be sweet.

This argument is strong because the premises provide strong support for the conclusion, but it does not guarantee that the next strawberry will be sweet. It is an inductively strong argument.

In the example of the deductive valid argument, the argument is both valid and sound. It is valid because the conclusion logically follows from the premises, and it is sound because the premises are true.

In the example of the inductively strong argument, the argument is cogent. It is strong because the premises provide strong support for the conclusion, and it is cogent because the premises are true. However, it is important to note that even though an inductive argument may be strong and cogent, it still does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion.

Explain the Difference Between a Deductive Argument That Is Valid

Definitions: