Mattel Overpays for the Learning Company

question 101

Essay

Mattel Overpays for The Learning Company
Despite disturbing discoveries during due diligence, Mattel acquired The Learning Company (TLC), a leading developer of software for toys, in a stock-for-stock transaction valued at $3.5 billion on May 13, 1999. Mattel had determined that TLC's receivables were overstated because product returns from distributors were not deducted from receivables and its allowance for bad debt was inadequate. A $50 million licensing deal also had been prematurely put on the balance sheet. Finally, TLC's brands were becoming outdated. TLC had substantially exaggerated the amount of money put into research and development for new software products. Nevertheless, driven by the appeal of rapidly becoming a big player in the children's software market, Mattel closed on the transaction aware that TLC's cash flows were overstated.
For all of 1999, TLC represented a pretax loss of $206 million. After restructuring charges, Mattel's consolidated 1999 net loss was $82.4 million on sales of $5.5 billion. TLC's top executives left Mattel and sold their Mattel shares in August, just before the third quarter's financial performance was released. Mattel's stock fell by more than 35% during 1999 to end the year at about $14 per share. On February 3, 2000, Mattel announced that its chief executive officer (CEO), Jill Barrad, was leaving the company.
On September 30, 2000, Mattel virtually gave away The Learning Company to rid itself of what had become a seemingly intractable problem. This ended what had become a disastrous foray into software publishing that had cost the firm literally hundreds of millions of dollars. Mattel, which had paid $3.5 billion for the firm in 1999, sold the unit to an affiliate of Gores Technology Group for rights to a share of future profits. Essentially, the deal consisted of no cash upfront and only a share of potential future revenues. In lieu of cash, Gores agreed to give Mattel 50 percent of any profits and part of any future sale of TLC. In a matter of weeks, Gores was able to do what Mattel could not do in a year. Gores restructured TLC's seven units into three, set strong controls on spending, sifted through 467 software titles to focus on the key brands, and repaired relationships with distributors. Gores also has sold the entertainment division.
:
-Why could Gores Technology do in a matter of weeks what the behemoth toy company,Mattel,could not
do?

Understand how Venn diagrams represent categorical propositions.

Interpret the meaning and application of shading and Xs in Venn diagrams.

Distinguish among different types of categorical propositions using Venn diagrams.

Recognize the relationship between existential import and Venn diagrams.

---

Definitions:

Corporate Guidelines

Policies and procedures established by a company to set standards and rules for employee behavior and company operations.

Oversampling

The practice of sampling a subgroup of a population at a higher rate than its proportion in the whole population to ensure adequate representation.

Hidden Profiles

Situations in which the best collective decision is not obvious because each team member has access to unique information not held by others, often leading to suboptimal decision-making.

Demonstrably Correct Solutions

Demonstrably Correct Solutions are solutions or answers to problems that can be proven to be right or effective through evidence or demonstration.