Examlex
Oracle Attempts to Takeover PeopleSoft
PeopleSoft, a maker of human resource and database software, announced on February 9, 2004 that an increased bid by Oracle, a maker of database software, of $26 per share made directly to the shareholders was inadequate. PeopleSoft’s board and management rejected the bid even though it represented a 33% increase over Oracle’s previous offer of $19.50 per share. The PeopleSoft board urged its shareholders to reject the bid in a mailing of its own to its shareholders. If successful, the takeover would be valued at $9.4 billion. After an initial jump to $23.72 a share, PeopleSoft shares had eased to $22.70 a share, well below Oracle’s sweetened offer.
The rejection prolonged a highly contentious and public eight-month takeover battle that has pitted the two firms against each other. PeopleSoft was quick to rebuke publicly Oracle’s original written offer made behind the scenes to PeopleSoft’s management that included a requirement that PeopleSoft respond immediately. At about the same time, Oracle filed its intentions with respect to PeopleSoft with the SEC when its ownership of PeopleSoft stock rose above 5%. Since then, Oracle proposed replacing five of PeopleSoft’s board members with its own nominees at the PeopleSoft annual meeting to be held on March 25, 2004, in addition to increasing the offer price. This meeting was held about two months earlier than its normally scheduled annual meetings. By moving up the schedule for the meeting, investors had less time to buy PeopleSoft shares in order to be able to vote at the meeting, where the two companies will present rival slates for the PeopleSoft board. Oracle seeks to gain a majority on the PeopleSoft board in order to lift the company’s unique “customer assurance” anti-takeover defense. PeopleSoft advised its shareholders to vote no on the slate of potential board members proposed by Oracle. PeopleSoft also announced that it would buyback another $200 million of its shares, following the $350 million buyback program completed last year.
Oracle has said that it will take $9.8 billion (including transaction fees) to complete the deal. The cost of acquiring PeopleSoft could escalate under PeopleSoft’s unusual customer assurance program in which its customers have been offered money-back guarantees if an acquirer reduces its support of PeopleSoft products. Oracle repeated its intention to continue support for PeopleSoft customers and products. The potential liability under the program increased to $1.55 billion. In addition, Oracle will have to pay PeopleSoft’s CEO Craig Conway a substantial multiple of his current annual salary if he loses his job after a takeover. This could cost Oracle an additional $25 to $30 million. Meanwhile, the Federal Trade Commission is reviewing the proposed acquisition of PeopleSoft by Oracle and has expressed concern that it will leave to reduced competition in the software industry
-After initially jumping, PeopleSoft's share price dropped to about $22 per share, well below Oracle's sweetened offer. When does this tell you about investors' expectations about the deal. Why do you believe investors felt the way they did? Be specific.
Interval Recording
A data collection method where the observation period is divided into intervals, and the presence or absence of behavior is recorded in each interval.
Counting Behavior
The process of systematically tallying instances of a specific behavior for the purpose of analysis or intervention.
Baseline
A term used to describe data collected from behavioral observations of a target behavior before intervention is implemented. Baseline data help teachers determine whether an intervention was effective by comparing the rate at which a behavior occurred before and after the intervention was implemented.
Placebo Effect
A phenomenon where an individual experiences a perceived improvement in condition or symptoms after receiving a treatment that has no therapeutic effect.
Q18: Joint ventures are cooperative business relationships formed
Q27: Why might it be important to distinguish
Q42: Briefly discuss the continuity-discontinuity controversy.
Q46: How did big banks during the 1990s
Q49: When cash flow is temporarily depressed due
Q55: Investment decisions,including M&As,often contain certain "embedded options"
Q69: The comparable companies' method and recent transactions
Q80: The control model of corporate governance is
Q112: Which of the following statements best describes
Q118: Despite the pressure of an attractive purchase