Examlex
Your textbook modifies the four assumptions for the multiple regression model by adding a new assumption. This represents an extension of the cross-sectional data case, where errors are uncorrelated across entities. The new assumption requires the errors to be uncorrelated across time, conditional on the regressors as well (cov(uit, uis | Xit, Xis)= 0 for t ≠ s.).
(a)Discuss why there might be correlation over time in the errors when you use U.S. state panel data. Does this mean that you should not use OLS as an estimator?
(b)Now consider pairs of adjacent states such as Indiana and Michigan, Texas and Arkansas, New York and Connecticut, etc. Is it likely that the fifth assumption will hold here, even though the "contemporaneous" errors are correlated? If not, can you still use OLS for estimation?
Incorrect NPI
Refers to an error in the National Provider Identifier, a unique identification number for health care providers in the United States.
Abuse
The intentional mistreatment or harmful behavior towards another person, animal, or entity that can be physical, emotional, sexual, or neglectful.
Without Intent
An action or outcome occurring without the intention or purpose of causing it, often relevant in legal contexts regarding liability.
Copay
A fixed amount paid by a patient for a healthcare service at the time of the service, as part of an insurance policy's terms.
Q3: Assume that data are available on other
Q4: Sketch for the log-log model what the
Q10: The first difference of the logarithm of
Q17: In this case, the Granger causality
Q18: (Requires Appendix material)The relationship between the
Q21: All of the following are examples
Q38: Your packaging company fills various types
Q38: The link between the variance of
Q56: For a single restriction (q = 1),
Q105: If the reserve-deposit ratio falls,then<br>A) the ability