Which of the Following Was the Result in the Case

question 6

Multiple Choice

Which of the following was the result in the Case Nugget in the text involving the dispute between Dr.Ralph M.Aurigemma and New Castle Care,LLC,involving whether an oral agreement entered into on September 4 involving Dr.Aurigemma serving as medical director from October 1 of that year until October 1 of the next year was enforceable?

• A)That the contract was not in writing and,therefore,could not be enforced.
• B)That the contract could be enforced because of the parol evidence rule.
• C)That the contract was enforceable because of the partial-performance exception to the statute of frauds.
• D)That the contract could not be enforced because of the parol evidence rule.
• E)That the contract was enforceable because agreements for professional services do not come within the protection of the statute of frauds.

---

Definitions:

Government Concessions

Government concessions are compromises or allowances made by a governing body toward a dissenting group or population, often in response to demands made through protests or negotiations.

Protesters' Demands

encapsulates the specific changes or actions that a group of people publicly demonstrating are seeking to achieve from an authority or institution.

Protest Movements

Collective efforts of individuals or groups to express opposition to, or demand changes in, political, social, economic, or environmental issues.

National Industrial Recovery Act

A 1933 U.S. law aimed at boosting economic recovery during the Great Depression, which sought to encourage industrial growth and improve labor conditions.