Which of the Following Was the Result in Choices in Cmty.Living

question 54

Multiple Choice

Which of the following was the result in Choices in Cmty.Living Inc. ,v.Petkus,the case in the text in which the plaintiff alleged that the defendant violated the Fair Housing Act (FHA) by discriminating against the cognitively disabled in the provision of housing?

• A)That the defendant did not violate the FHA because zoning regulations prevented renting the dwelling at issue to three or more unrelated people,as requested by the plaintiffs.
• B)That the defendant did not violate the FHA because of the reasonable belief on the part of the defendant that the proposed renters would commit substantial waste and damage.
• C)That the defendant did not violate the FHA because the FHA only prohibits discrimination against the physically disabled,not individuals who have cognitive disabilities.
• D)That the defendant did not violate the FHA because the defendant established that more desirable renters than the disabled applicants at issue were willing to rent the property at issue.
• E)That the defendant violated the FHA.

---

Definitions:

Evaluativist theory

A perspective in psychology focusing on how individuals assess, judge, or make decisions based on information and moral principles.

Objective theory

A concept or framework that proposes understanding and interpreting phenomena based on observable and measurable evidence, uninfluenced by emotions or personal prejudices.

Subjective theory

A perspective emphasizing the importance of personal perspectives and feelings in interpreting events, as opposed to objective facts.

Universal justification

A philosophical concept proposing that certain principles or reasons for actions are universally applicable and can be justified across different contexts.