What Did the Court in the Case in the Text

question 27

Multiple Choice

What did the court in the case in the text, Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc., rule regarding whether the noncompete agreement at issue in the case was enforceable?

• A) The court ruled that the noncompete agreement was enforceable because the employee received independent consideration for it in the form of increased wages.
• B) The court ruled that the noncompete agreement was enforceable because the employee received independent consideration for it in the form of a fixed term of employment.
• C) The court ruled that the noncompete agreement was enforceable because the employee received independent consideration for it in the form of a promotion.
• D) The court ruled that the noncompete agreement was unenforceable because the employee did not have sufficient education to understand it.
• E) The court ruled that the noncompete agreement was not enforceable because of a lack of consideration.

---

Definitions:

Social Domain Approach

The concept that moral reasoning needs to be considered in the context in which judgments are being made at a given time.

Emotional Self-Regulation

The ability to manage and control one's emotional responses to stimuli or situations through various strategies.

Social Self-Limitation

Social self-limitation is the process by which individuals impose limits on their social interactions and activities, often based on societal norms, personal beliefs, or psychological states.

Instrumental Non-Aggression

A principle or behavior guided by the intention to avoid direct conflict or aggression to achieve one's ends through indirect means.