Describe the Differences Between Linville's Complexity-Extremity Hypothesis and Tesser's Thought-Polarization

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Linville's complexity-extremity hypothesis and Tesser's thought-polarization hypothesis are both theories that seek to explain the way individuals form and maintain their attitudes and beliefs. However, they differ in their focus and the mechanisms they propose.

Linville's complexity-extremity hypothesis suggests that individuals tend to form more extreme attitudes and beliefs when they encounter complex or ambiguous information. This means that when people are presented with information that is difficult to process or understand, they are more likely to adopt more extreme positions in order to simplify and make sense of the information. In contrast, Tesser's thought-polarization hypothesis focuses on the idea that individuals tend to become more extreme in their attitudes and beliefs over time, as they engage in repeated discussions and thoughts about the topic. This means that the more people think and talk about a certain issue, the more extreme their attitudes and beliefs become.

In summary, while both hypotheses address the tendency for individuals to form and maintain extreme attitudes and beliefs, Linville's complexity-extremity hypothesis focuses on the impact of complex information, while Tesser's thought-polarization hypothesis focuses on the impact of repeated thoughts and discussions.

Describe the Differences Between Linville's Complexity-Extremity Hypothesis and Tesser's Thought-Polarization

Definitions: