What Did the Court Rule in the Case of Hubbard

question 85

Multiple Choice

What did the court rule in the case of Hubbard v. UTZ Quality Foods, Inc., in which the buyer refused on the basis of color to accept potatoes that were the subject of an installment contract?

• A) That the failure to meet the proper color standard was not a substantial impairment.
• B) That the failure to meet the proper color standard was a substantial impairment but that it did not impair the contract.
• C) That the failure to meet the proper color standard amounted to a substantial impairment of the installments, substantially impairing the whole contract.
• D) That the refusal to accept the potatoes was made in bad faith.
• E) That the tendering of the potatoes was made in bad faith.

---

Definitions:

Friedman Test

This non-parametric approach is utilized to identify distinctions in treatments throughout multiple testing sessions.

Test Statistic

A value calculated from sample data during a hypothesis test, used to decide whether to support or reject the null hypothesis.

P-value

A statistical measure that helps determine the significance of results obtained in hypothesis testing, indicating the probability of observing the obtained results if the null hypothesis were true.

Friedman Test

A test that doesn't rely on parameter-specific data, used to identify treatment variances across several trials.