Which of the Following Was the Result in Family Winemakers

question 12

Multiple Choice

Which of the following was the result in Family Winemakers of California v.Jenkins,the case brought by winemakers from California challenging a Massachusetts law distinguishing between how large and small winemakers could distribute their wines in Massachusetts?

• A) That the law impermissibly discriminated against out-of-state winemakers in violation of the Commerce Clause.
• B) That the law permissibly discriminated against out-of-state winemakers and did not violate the commerce clause.
• C) That the law impermissibly discriminated against out-of-state winemakers in violation of the Twenty-first Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
• D) That the law impermissibly discriminated against out-of-state winemakers in violation of the Webb-Kenyon Acts.
• E) That the law did not discriminate against out-of-state winemakers and that, therefore, no violation occurred.

---

Definitions:

Positive Instance

An item that belongs to a given class and possesses the trait attributed to the class by a given generalization.

Negative Instance

An item that belongs to a given class and does not possess the trait attributed to the class by a given generalization.

Inductive Generalization

A reasoning process that involves making broad generalizations based on specific observations.

General Principle

A broad and foundational rule or belief that guides actions and understanding in various situations.