Write a Fictional Argumentative Dialogue Between Two Characters Who Disagree

question 23

Essay

Write a fictional argumentative dialogue between two characters who disagree about what the basic nature of reality is.
The two characters can defend any metaphysical viewpoint,including ones developed in Chapter Four.
However,any option ought to be defended or criticized with arguments.
Aside from the option you are arguing for and against,your dialogue should address five other philosophers,and/or frameworks discussed in the chapter.
You can use these as a resource for arguments,or simply as a means of clarifying your viewpoint.
The dialogue can end with agreement,with agreeing to disagree,or with arriving at a new viewpoint,synthesizing their starting standpoints.

---

Definitions:

Misperceptions

Incorrect or flawed understandings or interpretations of information, events, or situations.

Common Language

A language that is widely used and understood among individuals from different linguistic backgrounds, facilitating communication.

Gestalt Psychologists

Psychologists who focus on how people intuitively perceive things as whole entities or patterns, emphasizing the holistic processing of visual information.

Perceptual Performance

The efficiency or accuracy with which an individual can detect, process, and interpret sensory information.