The Private Right to Sue for Private Nuisance Was Reinforced

question 19

Multiple Choice

The private right to sue for private nuisance was reinforced with the Supreme Court of Canada decision in St.Lawrence Cement Inc.v.Barrette in Quebec.Which of the following is incorrect related to this case?

• A)The court gave a broader definition to neighbour,giving all of the people affected the right of action.
• B)The common law doctrine of nuisance would have led to a different decision.
• C)This action went forward as a class action,allowing the burden of bringing action to be spread much more widely.
• D)As a result of this case,private nuisance is a much more effective tool.
• E)St.Lawrence Cement Inc.was found liable.

Identify what constitutes collateral and the classification of goods within the context of secured transactions.

Describe the conditions under which a financing statement is considered valid and the duration of its validity under the UCC.

Comprehend the formation and priority of purchase-money security interests.

Identify the agreement necessary for a debtor to grant a secured interest to a secured party and understand the significance of a security agreement.