In the Facts of the Previous Questions,according to the Reasoning

question 5

Multiple Choice

In the facts of the previous questions,according to the reasoning of the dissent in the Greene case,VividAire may owe consumers of air freshener

• A)a duty not to increase the price of the product if it does not perform as promised.
• B)a duty to warn that ingesting the liquid poses a specific material risk of death.
• C)a refund or replacement if the product does not freshen the air.
• D)no duty with respect to the liquid's air-freshening capability or to harm that may result from ingesting it.