Examlex

Solved

Your Textbook Used the California Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR)data

question 43

Essay

Your textbook used the California Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR)data set on test student performance in Chapters 4-7.One justification for putting second to twelfth graders through such an exercise once a year is to make schools more accountable.The hope is that schools with low scores will improve the following year and in the future.To test for the presence of such an effect,you collect data from 1,000 L.A.County schools for grade 4 scores in 1998 and 1999,both for reading (Read)and mathematics (Maths).Both are on a scale from zero to one hundred.The regression results are as follows (homoskedasticity-only standard errors in parentheses): Your textbook used the California Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR)data set on test student performance in Chapters 4-7.One justification for putting second to twelfth graders through such an exercise once a year is to make schools more accountable.The hope is that schools with low scores will improve the following year and in the future.To test for the presence of such an effect,you collect data from 1,000 L.A.County schools for grade 4 scores in 1998 and 1999,both for reading (Read)and mathematics (Maths).Both are on a scale from zero to one hundred.The regression results are as follows (homoskedasticity-only standard errors in parentheses): = 6.967 + 0.919 ,R2 = 0.825,SER = 7.818 (0.542)(0.013) = 4.131 + 0.943, = R2 = 0.887,SER = 6.416 (0.409)(0.011) (a)Interpret the results and indicate whether or not the coefficients are significantly different from zero.Do the coefficients have the expected sign and magnitude? (b)Discuss various threats to internal and external validity,and try to assess whether or not these are likely to be present in your study. (c)Changing the estimation method to allow for heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors produces four new standard errors: (0.539), (0.015), (0.452),and (0.015)in the order of appearance in the two equations above.Given these numbers,do any of your statements in (b)change? Do you think that the coefficients themselves changed? (d)If reading and maths scores were the same in 1999 as in 1998,on average,what coefficients would you expect for the intercept and the slope? How would you test for the restrictions? (e)The appropriate F-statistic in (d)is 138.27 for the maths scores,and 104.85 for the reading scores.Comparing these values to the critical values in the F table,can you reject the null hypothesis in each case? (f)Your professor tells you that the analysis reminds her of Galton's Fallacy. Sir Francis Galton regressed the height of children on the average height of their parents.He found a positive intercept and a slope between zero and one.Being concerned about the height of the English aristocracy,he interpreted the results as regression to mediocrity (hence the name regression).Do you see the parallel? = 6.967 + 0.919 Your textbook used the California Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR)data set on test student performance in Chapters 4-7.One justification for putting second to twelfth graders through such an exercise once a year is to make schools more accountable.The hope is that schools with low scores will improve the following year and in the future.To test for the presence of such an effect,you collect data from 1,000 L.A.County schools for grade 4 scores in 1998 and 1999,both for reading (Read)and mathematics (Maths).Both are on a scale from zero to one hundred.The regression results are as follows (homoskedasticity-only standard errors in parentheses): = 6.967 + 0.919 ,R2 = 0.825,SER = 7.818 (0.542)(0.013) = 4.131 + 0.943, = R2 = 0.887,SER = 6.416 (0.409)(0.011) (a)Interpret the results and indicate whether or not the coefficients are significantly different from zero.Do the coefficients have the expected sign and magnitude? (b)Discuss various threats to internal and external validity,and try to assess whether or not these are likely to be present in your study. (c)Changing the estimation method to allow for heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors produces four new standard errors: (0.539), (0.015), (0.452),and (0.015)in the order of appearance in the two equations above.Given these numbers,do any of your statements in (b)change? Do you think that the coefficients themselves changed? (d)If reading and maths scores were the same in 1999 as in 1998,on average,what coefficients would you expect for the intercept and the slope? How would you test for the restrictions? (e)The appropriate F-statistic in (d)is 138.27 for the maths scores,and 104.85 for the reading scores.Comparing these values to the critical values in the F table,can you reject the null hypothesis in each case? (f)Your professor tells you that the analysis reminds her of Galton's Fallacy. Sir Francis Galton regressed the height of children on the average height of their parents.He found a positive intercept and a slope between zero and one.Being concerned about the height of the English aristocracy,he interpreted the results as regression to mediocrity (hence the name regression).Do you see the parallel? ,R2 = 0.825,SER = 7.818
(0.542)(0.013) Your textbook used the California Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR)data set on test student performance in Chapters 4-7.One justification for putting second to twelfth graders through such an exercise once a year is to make schools more accountable.The hope is that schools with low scores will improve the following year and in the future.To test for the presence of such an effect,you collect data from 1,000 L.A.County schools for grade 4 scores in 1998 and 1999,both for reading (Read)and mathematics (Maths).Both are on a scale from zero to one hundred.The regression results are as follows (homoskedasticity-only standard errors in parentheses): = 6.967 + 0.919 ,R2 = 0.825,SER = 7.818 (0.542)(0.013) = 4.131 + 0.943, = R2 = 0.887,SER = 6.416 (0.409)(0.011) (a)Interpret the results and indicate whether or not the coefficients are significantly different from zero.Do the coefficients have the expected sign and magnitude? (b)Discuss various threats to internal and external validity,and try to assess whether or not these are likely to be present in your study. (c)Changing the estimation method to allow for heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors produces four new standard errors: (0.539), (0.015), (0.452),and (0.015)in the order of appearance in the two equations above.Given these numbers,do any of your statements in (b)change? Do you think that the coefficients themselves changed? (d)If reading and maths scores were the same in 1999 as in 1998,on average,what coefficients would you expect for the intercept and the slope? How would you test for the restrictions? (e)The appropriate F-statistic in (d)is 138.27 for the maths scores,and 104.85 for the reading scores.Comparing these values to the critical values in the F table,can you reject the null hypothesis in each case? (f)Your professor tells you that the analysis reminds her of Galton's Fallacy. Sir Francis Galton regressed the height of children on the average height of their parents.He found a positive intercept and a slope between zero and one.Being concerned about the height of the English aristocracy,he interpreted the results as regression to mediocrity (hence the name regression).Do you see the parallel? = 4.131 + 0.943, Your textbook used the California Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR)data set on test student performance in Chapters 4-7.One justification for putting second to twelfth graders through such an exercise once a year is to make schools more accountable.The hope is that schools with low scores will improve the following year and in the future.To test for the presence of such an effect,you collect data from 1,000 L.A.County schools for grade 4 scores in 1998 and 1999,both for reading (Read)and mathematics (Maths).Both are on a scale from zero to one hundred.The regression results are as follows (homoskedasticity-only standard errors in parentheses): = 6.967 + 0.919 ,R2 = 0.825,SER = 7.818 (0.542)(0.013) = 4.131 + 0.943, = R2 = 0.887,SER = 6.416 (0.409)(0.011) (a)Interpret the results and indicate whether or not the coefficients are significantly different from zero.Do the coefficients have the expected sign and magnitude? (b)Discuss various threats to internal and external validity,and try to assess whether or not these are likely to be present in your study. (c)Changing the estimation method to allow for heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors produces four new standard errors: (0.539), (0.015), (0.452),and (0.015)in the order of appearance in the two equations above.Given these numbers,do any of your statements in (b)change? Do you think that the coefficients themselves changed? (d)If reading and maths scores were the same in 1999 as in 1998,on average,what coefficients would you expect for the intercept and the slope? How would you test for the restrictions? (e)The appropriate F-statistic in (d)is 138.27 for the maths scores,and 104.85 for the reading scores.Comparing these values to the critical values in the F table,can you reject the null hypothesis in each case? (f)Your professor tells you that the analysis reminds her of Galton's Fallacy. Sir Francis Galton regressed the height of children on the average height of their parents.He found a positive intercept and a slope between zero and one.Being concerned about the height of the English aristocracy,he interpreted the results as regression to mediocrity (hence the name regression).Do you see the parallel? = R2 = 0.887,SER = 6.416
(0.409)(0.011)
(a)Interpret the results and indicate whether or not the coefficients are significantly different from zero.Do the coefficients have the expected sign and magnitude?
(b)Discuss various threats to internal and external validity,and try to assess whether or not these are likely to be present in your study.
(c)Changing the estimation method to allow for heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors produces four new standard errors: (0.539), (0.015), (0.452),and (0.015)in the order of appearance in the two equations above.Given these numbers,do any of your statements in (b)change? Do you think that the coefficients themselves changed?
(d)If reading and maths scores were the same in 1999 as in 1998,on average,what coefficients would you expect for the intercept and the slope? How would you test for the restrictions?
(e)The appropriate F-statistic in (d)is 138.27 for the maths scores,and 104.85 for the reading scores.Comparing these values to the critical values in the F table,can you reject the null hypothesis in each case?
(f)Your professor tells you that the analysis reminds her of "Galton's Fallacy." Sir Francis Galton regressed the height of children on the average height of their parents.He found a positive intercept and a slope between zero and one.Being concerned about the height of the English aristocracy,he interpreted the results as "regression to mediocrity" (hence the name regression).Do you see the parallel?

Definitions:

Muscoskeletal Issues

Health problems affecting the muscles, bones, and joints, often causing pain, weakness, or reduced mobility.

Cocaine Metabolites

The chemical compounds produced when cocaine is broken down in the body, which are used in drug testing to detect cocaine use.

Amphetamines

A class of stimulant drugs that can enhance the nervous system, often used medicinally for ADHD and narcolepsy but also abused recreationally.

Opiate Metabolites

The breakdown products formed when the body processes opiates, useful in detecting opiate use through various testing methods.

Related Questions

Q1: Which of the following markets is/are said

Q12: In which of the following relationships does

Q15: Think of the situation of rolling two

Q28: If the absolute value of your calculated

Q34: The central limit theorem<br>A)states conditions under which

Q35: Exchange-traded derivatives volume is less than one

Q36: A swap involving two floating rates is

Q45: Which of the following would not be

Q57: Value at Risk provides an estimate of

Q60: When testing for differences of means,you can