The Case of Shelanu Inc

question 75

Multiple Choice

The case of Shelanu Inc. v. Print Three Franchising Corporation involved a case whether a franchisor had a duty of good faith to the franchisee. What did the Court of Appeal hold?

• A) The breach was considered inconsequential at law.
• B) The plaintiff was not entitled to terminate the franchise agreement since the franchisor had not breached their duty of good faith.
• C) The plaintiff was entitled to terminate the franchise agreement since the franchisor had breached their duty of good faith.
• D) The plaintiff was entitled to terminate the franchise agreement since there was no breach of the duty of good faith.
• E) The plaintiff was entitled to terminate the franchise agreement since there was a breach of the duty of good faith.