In CASE 44,Fisher V

question 8

Multiple Choice

In CASE 4.4,Fisher v.University of Texas at Austin (2016) ,the U.S.Supreme Court held that

• A) when race is involved,a university admission test must be analyzed under the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection clauses using a strict scrutiny test.
• B) when gender is involved,a university admission test must be analyzed under the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection clause using a rational basis test.
• C) a university admission test must be analyzed under the Fifth Amendment's rational basis test.
• D) when gender is involved,a university admission test must be analyzed under the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection clause using the substantially-related test.

---

Definitions:

Court Action

Legal proceedings initiated to enforce a right or seek a remedy from a court of law.

Sexual Harassment

Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature that affects an individual's employment or creates a hostile work environment.

Monopsonist

A market situation where there is only one buyer for a product or service, giving this buyer significant power over the price and terms of purchase.

Bilateral Monopolist

This term describes a market with only one supplier (monopolist) and one buyer (monopsonist), leading to Unique negotiation dynamics over price and quantity.