Examlex

Solved

Use the Following to Answer Questions

question 156

Multiple Choice

Use the following to answer questions :
Scenario II
The scenario contains fabricated results consistent with the following study:
Petty,R.E. ,Cacioppo,J.T. ,& Goldman,R.(1981) .Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,41,847-855.
Every day,consumers are exposed to scientifically based sales,marketing,and public relations strategies designed to influence purchasing decisions,change opinions,or win votes.One common sales strategy is the foot-in-the-door technique,a method that involves first making a smaller request that consumers are likely to grant and then following it with a larger request.Another common strategy is the door-in-the-face technique,which involves making an unreasonably large request that consumers will reject and then following it with a smaller request.When persuasion is necessary,it usually takes one of two forms: heuristic persuasion,which involves an appeal to habits or emotion,and systematic persuasion,which involves an appeal to facts and reason.Often,people will rely more on heuristics-simple shortcuts or "rules of thumb"-to make decisions instead of systematically weighing the evidence.
Petty and colleagues (1981) investigated some of these techniques in university students listening to arguments in favour of their university requiring an institution-level comprehensive final examination for graduation.Some students were led to believe that,if adopted,this policy would take place right away,and some were led to believe that the change would take place in a decade.In addition,some of the students were led to believe that they were listening to an argument from a Princeton professor,and others were led to believe that they were listening to an argument from a high school student.Finally,some students heard strong arguments in favour of the policy,and some heard weak arguments.Thus,the experiment arranged six groups of students.For example,one group of students heard strong arguments from a high school student about a far-removed policy change.Figure 13.1 shows fabricated results illustrating the major findings of this experiment.
Figure 13.1 Use the following to answer questions : Scenario II The scenario contains fabricated results consistent with the following study: Petty,R.E. ,Cacioppo,J.T. ,& Goldman,R.(1981) .Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,41,847-855. Every day,consumers are exposed to scientifically based sales,marketing,and public relations strategies designed to influence purchasing decisions,change opinions,or win votes.One common sales strategy is the foot-in-the-door technique,a method that involves first making a smaller request that consumers are likely to grant and then following it with a larger request.Another common strategy is the door-in-the-face technique,which involves making an unreasonably large request that consumers will reject and then following it with a smaller request.When persuasion is necessary,it usually takes one of two forms: heuristic persuasion,which involves an appeal to habits or emotion,and systematic persuasion,which involves an appeal to facts and reason.Often,people will rely more on heuristics-simple shortcuts or  rules of thumb -to make decisions instead of systematically weighing the evidence. Petty and colleagues (1981) investigated some of these techniques in university students listening to arguments in favour of their university requiring an institution-level comprehensive final examination for graduation.Some students were led to believe that,if adopted,this policy would take place right away,and some were led to believe that the change would take place in a decade.In addition,some of the students were led to believe that they were listening to an argument from a Princeton professor,and others were led to believe that they were listening to an argument from a high school student.Finally,some students heard strong arguments in favour of the policy,and some heard weak arguments.Thus,the experiment arranged six groups of students.For example,one group of students heard strong arguments from a high school student about a far-removed policy change.Figure 13.1 shows fabricated results illustrating the major findings of this experiment. Figure 13.1   -(Scenario II) The results shown in Figure 13.1 suggest that university students were systematically persuaded when the: A) argument was strong. B) policy change was far in the future. C) Princeton professor presented a strong argument about a delayed policy change. D) high school student presented a strong argument about an imminent policy change.
-(Scenario II) The results shown in Figure 13.1 suggest that university students were systematically persuaded when the:


Definitions:

Organization's Policies

Official rules and guidelines that govern how an organization operates and makes decisions.

Occupational Safety

The discipline focused on the safety, health, and welfare of people engaged in work or employment, aiming to reduce workplace hazards and prevent accidents and injuries.

Citations Posting

The act of documenting and sharing references or sources, typically used in academic or professional research to acknowledge the original works of others.

Hazard Violation

A breach of workplace safety standards that poses a risk to health and safety.

Related Questions