Compare and Contrast Canadian and American LRL

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is suggested: Probably fairest to suggest that both started off at about the same place but the Canadian legislation has to a degree evolved in some different directions in part because of the European influence brought in through Quebec),although there are still broad areas of similarity.Canadian legislation is more fragmented in the U.S.,there's just one private sector law).Because of this fact,experimentation with labour law may have been facilitated here laboratory of democracy argument which suggests that decentralized systems can innovate at lower risk).Both countries' laws tend to be relatively voluntarist and to emphasize processes rather than outcomes,but the U.S.law has remained truer to its voluntarist heritage,since Canada has compulsory conciliation and grievance arbitration and stronger anti- strikebreaking laws,as well as other laws like first- contract arbitration which protect workers.Worker protection is generally greater in Canada; union certification is generally easier here,since many jurisdictions still rely on the card count rather than the vote,and even those using a vote use a "quickie" vote to try to minimize the chance of employer interference.Union security is more closely guarded in Canada,where something like the "Rand Formula" generally applies and where there's no equivalent to the 1947 Taft- Hartley "right- to- work" provisions.In addition,laws against unfair employer labour practice are generally more strictly enforced here.

Compare and Contrast Canadian and American LRL

Definitions: