Consequentialist (Or Utilitarian)reasoning Justifies Action in Terms of the Outcomes

question 22

Multiple Choice

Consequentialist (or utilitarian) reasoning justifies action in terms of the outcomes generated (e.g.,the greatest good for the greatest number of people) .Such reasoning is part of which argument for corporate social responsibility?

• A)Ethical
• B)Moral
• C)Rational
• D)Economic

---

Definitions:

Adverse Selection

Refers to the fact that “bad types” are likely to be selected in transactions where one party is better informed than the other. Examples include higher risk individuals being more likely to purchase insurance, more low-quality cars (lemons) being offered for sale, or lazy workers being more likely to accept job offers. Adverse selection is a precontractual problem that arises from hidden information about risks, quality, or character.

Insurance

A financial product offering protection against the potential financial loss or liability resulting from specific events or circumstances, in exchange for a premium payment.

Adverse Selection

A situation in markets where buyers or sellers have information that other participants do not, leading to an unfair advantage or market inefficiency.

Risk Aversion

a preference for certain outcomes over uncertain ones, often characterized by the avoidance of risky situations.