What Is the Difference Between a True Experiment and an Ex

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is A true experiment and an ex post facto research design are both types of research methods used in scientific studies, but they have distinct differences in their approach and the conclusions that can be drawn from them.

A true experiment is a research design in which the researcher manipulates an independent variable and measures the effect on a dependent variable while controlling for other variables. This design allows the researcher to establish a cause-and-effect relationship between the independent and dependent variables, as the manipulation of the independent variable directly influences the outcome.

On the other hand, an ex post facto research design is a type of observational study in which the researcher examines the effects of an independent variable that has already occurred, without any manipulation or control over the variables. This design is used when it is not feasible or ethical to manipulate the independent variable, and the researcher can only observe and analyze the existing data.

In a true experiment, the researcher can draw cause-and-effect conclusions because they have control over the manipulation of the independent variable, allowing them to establish a direct relationship between the variables. However, in an ex post facto research design, the researcher cannot draw cause-and-effect conclusions because they cannot control or manipulate the independent variable, and there may be other confounding variables that influence the outcome.

In conclusion, a true experiment allows the researcher to draw cause-and-effect conclusions due to the manipulation and control of variables, while an ex post facto research design does not allow for the same level of control and manipulation, making it difficult to establish direct cause-and-effect relationships.

What Is the Difference Between a True Experiment and an Ex

Definitions: