What Do Social Loafing and Decision Polarization Have in Common

question 134

Multiple Choice

What do social loafing and decision polarization have in common?

• A) Both are examples of how individuals and groups of people behave differently within larger groups than they would behave as individuals.
• B) Both effects show how individualism will lead people to not make an effort in large groups.
• C) Both effects show how individualism is maintained even within groups that exert considerable peer pressure.
• D) Group decisions become more extreme, so that individuals who are naturally lazy become even more so.
• E) Some people do not pay their "fair share" and this causes groups to polarize into smaller groups.

---

Definitions:

Incorporation

The process of legally declaring a corporate entity as separate from its owners, providing benefits like limited liability and perpetual existence.

Main Disadvantages

The primary or most significant negative aspects or drawbacks associated with a situation, decision, or action.

Annual General Meeting

A meeting where shareholders elect directors and vote on other important resolutions.

Nature

The phenomena of the physical world collectively, including plants, animals, landscapes, and other features and products of the earth, as opposed to humans or human creations.