Examlex
Overcoming Culture Clash:
Allianz AG Buys Pimco Advisors LP
On November 7, 1999, Allianz AG, the leading German insurance conglomerate, acquired Pimco Advisors LP for $3.3 billion. The Pimco acquisition boosts assets under management at Allianz from $400 billion to $650 billion, making it the sixth largest money manager in the world.
The cultural divide separating the two firms represented a potentially daunting challenge. Allianz’s management was well aware that firms distracted by culture clashes and the morale problems and mistrust they breed are less likely to realize the synergies and savings that caused them to acquire the company in the first place. Allianz was acutely aware of the potential problems as a result of difficulties they had experienced following the acquisition of Firemen’s Fund, a large U.S.-based property–casualty company.
A major motivation for the acquisition was to obtain the well-known skills of the elite Pimco money managers to broaden Allianz’s financial services product offering. Although retention bonuses can buy loyalty in the short run, employees of the acquired firm generally need much more than money in the long term. Pimco’s money managers stated publicly that they wanted Allianz to let them operate independently, the way Pimco existed under their former parent, Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company. Allianz had decided not only to run Pimco as an independent subsidiary but also to move $100 billion of Allianz’s assets to Pimco. Bill Gross, Pimco’s legendary bond trader, and other top Pimco money managers, now collect about one-fourth of their compensation in the form of Allianz stock. Moreover, most of the top managers have been asked to sign long-term employment contracts and have received retention bonuses.
Joachim Faber, chief of money management at Allianz, played an essential role in smoothing over cultural differences. Led by Faber, top Allianz executives had been visiting Pimco for months and having quiet dinners with top Pimco fixed income investment officials and their families. The intent of these intimate meetings was to reassure these officials that their operation would remain independent under Allianz’s ownership.
-What else could Allianz have done to minimize potential culture clash? Be specific.
Certified Applicator
An individual or entity recognized and authorized to apply certain products, often chemicals, according to regulatory standards.
FIFRA
The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) governs the registration, distribution, sale, and use of pesticides in the United States.
TSCA
The Toxic Substances Control Act, a United States law passed by Congress in 1976 designed to regulate the introduction of new or already existing chemicals.
Premanufacturing Notice
A requirement under environmental law for manufacturers to notify a government agency before producing or importing new chemicals.
Q54: Financial Corporation wants to acquire Great Western
Q59: Identify the takeover defenses employed by Arcelor?
Q77: The joint venture may represent an attractive
Q81: Given the results of the model from
Q110: primary reason the Sarbanes-Oxly Act of 2002
Q114: In mid-2008, Fresenius, a German manufacturer of
Q118: Which of the following are common objectives
Q123: All of the following are true of
Q127: Market profiling requires an analysis of all
Q149: A bear hug involves mailing a letter