Examlex

Solved

SCENARIO 17-10 Given Below Are Results from the Regression Analysis 1=1 =

question 345

True/False

SCENARIO 17-10 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy) and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age), the number of years of education received (Edu), the number of years at the previous job (Job Yr), a dummy variable for marital status (Married: 1=1 = married, 0=0 = otherwise), a dummy variable for head of household (Head: 1=1 = yes, 0=0 = no) and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: 1=1 = yes, 0=0 = no). We shall call this Model 1. The coefficient of partial determination ( Ry2R _ { \mathrm { y } } ^ { 2 } (All raiables excopt jj ) ) of each of the 6 predictors are, respectively, 0.28070.2807 , 0.0386,0.0317,0.0141,0.09580.0386,0.0317,0.0141,0.0958 , and 0.12010.1201 .

 Regression Statistics  Multiple R 0.7035 R Square 0.4949 Adjusted R 0.4030 Square  Standard 18.4861 Error  Observations 40\begin{array}{lr}\hline{\text { Regression Statistics }} \\\hline \text { Multiple R } & 0.7035 \\\text { R Square } & 0.4949 \\\text { Adjusted R } & 0.4030 \\\text { Square } & \\\text { Standard } & 18.4861 \\\text { Error } & \\\text { Observations } & 40 \\\hline\end{array}
 ANOVA \text { ANOVA }
 SCENARIO 17-10 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy) and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age), the number of years of education received (Edu), the number of years at the previous job (Job Yr), a dummy variable for marital status (Married:  1 =  married,  0 =  otherwise), a dummy variable for head of household (Head:  1 =  yes,  0 =  no) and a dummy variable for management position (Manager:  1 =  yes,  0 =  no). We shall call this Model 1. The coefficient of partial determination (  R _ { \mathrm { y } } ^ { 2 }  (All raiables excopt  j  ) ) of each of the 6 predictors are, respectively,  0.2807 ,  0.0386,0.0317,0.0141,0.0958 , and  0.1201 .   \begin{array}{lr} \hline{\text { Regression Statistics }} \\ \hline \text { Multiple R } & 0.7035 \\ \text { R Square } & 0.4949 \\ \text { Adjusted R } & 0.4030 \\ \text { Square } & \\ \text { Standard } & 18.4861 \\ \text { Error } & \\ \text { Observations } & 40 \\ \hline \end{array}    \text { ANOVA }       \begin{array}{l} \begin{array} { l r r r r r r }  \hline & \text { Coefficients } & \text { Standard Error } & { t \text { Stat } } & \text { P-value } & \text { Lower 95\% } & \text { Upper 95\% } \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 32.6595 & 23.18302 & 1.4088 & 0.1683 & - 14.5067 & 79.8257 \\ \text { Age } & 1.2915 & 0.3599 & 3.5883 & 0.0011 & 0.5592 & 2.0238 \\ \text { Edu } & - 1.3537 & 1.1766 & - 1.1504 & 0.2582 & - 3.7476 & 1.0402 \\ \text { Job Yr } & 0.6171 & 0.5940 & 1.0389 & 0.3064 & - 0.5914 & 1.8257 \\ \text { Married } & - 5.2189 & 7.6068 & - 0.6861 & 0.4974 & - 20.6950 & 10.2571 \\ \text { Head } & - 14.2978 & 7.6479 & - 1.8695 & 0.0704 & - 29.8575 & 1.2618 \\ \text { Manager } & - 24.8203 & 11.6932 & - 2.1226 & 0.0414 & - 48.6102 & - 1.0303 \\ \hline \end{array} \end{array}  -Referring to Scenario 17-10 and using both Model 1 and Model 2, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the independent variables that are not significant individually are also not significant as a group in explaining the variation in the dependent variable at a 5% level of significance?


 Coefficients  Standard Error t Stat  P-value  Lower 95%  Upper 95%  Intercept 32.659523.183021.40880.168314.506779.8257 Age 1.29150.35993.58830.00110.55922.0238 Edu 1.35371.17661.15040.25823.74761.0402 Job Yr 0.61710.59401.03890.30640.59141.8257 Married 5.21897.60680.68610.497420.695010.2571 Head 14.29787.64791.86950.070429.85751.2618 Manager 24.820311.69322.12260.041448.61021.0303\begin{array}{l}\begin{array} { l r r r r r r } \hline & \text { Coefficients } & \text { Standard Error } & { t \text { Stat } } & \text { P-value } & \text { Lower 95\% } & \text { Upper 95\% } \\\hline \text { Intercept } & 32.6595 & 23.18302 & 1.4088 & 0.1683 & - 14.5067 & 79.8257 \\\text { Age } & 1.2915 & 0.3599 & 3.5883 & 0.0011 & 0.5592 & 2.0238 \\\text { Edu } & - 1.3537 & 1.1766 & - 1.1504 & 0.2582 & - 3.7476 & 1.0402 \\\text { Job Yr } & 0.6171 & 0.5940 & 1.0389 & 0.3064 & - 0.5914 & 1.8257 \\\text { Married } & - 5.2189 & 7.6068 & - 0.6861 & 0.4974 & - 20.6950 & 10.2571 \\\text { Head } & - 14.2978 & 7.6479 & - 1.8695 & 0.0704 & - 29.8575 & 1.2618 \\\text { Manager } & - 24.8203 & 11.6932 & - 2.1226 & 0.0414 & - 48.6102 & - 1.0303 \\\hline\end{array}\end{array}
-Referring to Scenario 17-10 and using both Model 1 and Model 2, there is
sufficient evidence to conclude that the independent variables that are not significant individually
are also not significant as a group in explaining the variation in the dependent variable at a 5%
level of significance?


Definitions:

Authoritative

Commanding and self-assured; likely to be respected and obeyed, often used to describe a style of leadership or writing.

Constructive

An approach or feedback that is intended to bring about improvement or positive change.

Democratic Ideals

Principles that emphasize equality, freedom, and justice within a societal structure, promoting participation and representation in decision-making processes.

Unanimity

Complete agreement or concurrence among all members or participants in a particular situation or decision.

Related Questions