Some People Think California Would Be Governed Better If the State's

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is There are several electoral structures that have made political parties in California less capable of influencing the selection of candidates. One major factor is the state's open primary system, where all candidates, regardless of party affiliation, appear on the same primary ballot and the top two vote-getters, regardless of party, advance to the general election. This system diminishes the influence of political parties in candidate selection, as it allows for candidates from the same party to compete against each other in the general election.

Additionally, California's system of direct democracy, including initiatives and referendums, allows for voters to directly influence policy decisions, further reducing the influence of political parties in governance.

Whether stronger party control of candidates would be better for the state is a matter of debate. Some argue that stronger party control would lead to more cohesive and consistent policy-making, as candidates would be more likely to follow party policy. However, others argue that this could lead to a lack of diversity of ideas and perspectives in governance, as candidates would be beholden to party interests rather than the needs of their constituents.

Ultimately, the question of whether stronger party control of candidates would be better for California is a complex and contentious issue that requires careful consideration of the potential benefits and drawbacks.

Some People Think California Would Be Governed Better If the State's

Definitions: