Examlex

Solved

TABLE 16-12 A Local Store Developed a Multiplicative Time-Series Model to Forecast

question 40

Multiple Choice

TABLE 16-12
A local store developed a multiplicative time-series model to forecast its revenues in future quarters, using quarterly data on its revenues during the 4-year period from 2005 to 2009. The following is the resulting regression equation:
log₁₀ TABLE 16-12 A local store developed a multiplicative time-series model to forecast its revenues in future quarters, using quarterly data on its revenues during the 4-year period from 2005 to 2009. The following is the resulting regression equation: log₁₀   = 6.102 + 0.012 X - 0.129 Q₁ - 0.054 Q₂ + 0.098 Q₃ where   is the estimated number of contracts in a quarter. X is the coded quarterly value with X = 0 in the first quarter of 2005. Q₁ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the first quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. Q₂ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the second quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. Q₃ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the third quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. -Referring to Table 16-12, in testing the significance of the coefficient for Q₁ in the regression equation (-0.129)  which has a p-value of 0.492. Which of the following is the best interpretation of this result? A)  The revenues in the first quarter of the year are significantly different from the revenues in an average quarter (α = 0.05) . B)  The revenues in the first quarter of the year are not significantly different from the revenues in an average quarter (α = 0.05) . C)  The revenues in the first quarter of the year are significantly different from the revenues in the fourth quarter (α = 0.05) . D)  The revenues in the first quarter of the year are not significantly different from the revenues in the fourth quarter (α = 0.05) . = 6.102 + 0.012 X - 0.129 Q₁ - 0.054 Q₂ + 0.098 Q₃
where TABLE 16-12 A local store developed a multiplicative time-series model to forecast its revenues in future quarters, using quarterly data on its revenues during the 4-year period from 2005 to 2009. The following is the resulting regression equation: log₁₀   = 6.102 + 0.012 X - 0.129 Q₁ - 0.054 Q₂ + 0.098 Q₃ where   is the estimated number of contracts in a quarter. X is the coded quarterly value with X = 0 in the first quarter of 2005. Q₁ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the first quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. Q₂ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the second quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. Q₃ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the third quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. -Referring to Table 16-12, in testing the significance of the coefficient for Q₁ in the regression equation (-0.129)  which has a p-value of 0.492. Which of the following is the best interpretation of this result? A)  The revenues in the first quarter of the year are significantly different from the revenues in an average quarter (α = 0.05) . B)  The revenues in the first quarter of the year are not significantly different from the revenues in an average quarter (α = 0.05) . C)  The revenues in the first quarter of the year are significantly different from the revenues in the fourth quarter (α = 0.05) . D)  The revenues in the first quarter of the year are not significantly different from the revenues in the fourth quarter (α = 0.05) . is the estimated number of contracts in a quarter.
X is the coded quarterly value with X = 0 in the first quarter of 2005.
Q₁ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the first quarter of a year and 0 otherwise.
Q₂ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the second quarter of a year and 0 otherwise.
Q₃ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the third quarter of a year and 0 otherwise.
-Referring to Table 16-12, in testing the significance of the coefficient for Q₁ in the regression equation (-0.129) which has a p-value of 0.492. Which of the following is the best interpretation of this result?


Definitions:

Internal Validity

The extent to which a study accurately demonstrates a cause-and-effect relationship.

Experiments

Scientific procedures undertaken to make a discovery, test a hypothesis, or demonstrate a known fact.

Effect Size

A quantitative measure of the magnitude of a phenomenon or the strength of the relationship between variables.

Meta-Analysis

A statistical technique that combines the results of multiple scientific studies to arrive at a comprehensive conclusion, increasing the power and precision of the findings.

Related Questions