What Did the Court Rule in the Case of Hubbard

question 85

Multiple Choice

What did the court rule in the case of Hubbard v. UTZ Quality Foods, Inc., in which the buyer refused on the basis of color to accept potatoes that were the subject of an installment contract?

• A) That the failure to meet the proper color standard was not a substantial impairment.
• B) That the failure to meet the proper color standard was a substantial impairment but that it did not impair the contract.
• C) That the failure to meet the proper color standard amounted to a substantial impairment of the installments, substantially impairing the whole contract.
• D) That the refusal to accept the potatoes was made in bad faith.
• E) That the tendering of the potatoes was made in bad faith.

Understand the role of technology and cultural advancements in the evolution and adaptation of early humans.

Understand the distinguishing features of amphibians from fishes.

Identify characteristics and classification of flatworms.

Understand the distinction between protostomes and deuterostomes, including developmental stages.

---

Definitions:

Ethical Dilemma

A situation where a person is faced with a choice that involves a conflict between two moral imperatives, neither of which is unambiguously acceptable or preferable.

Clear Decision

An unambiguous and definitive resolution or ruling on a matter, leaving no room for confusion or doubt.

Firm

A business organization, such as a company or partnership, engaged in commercial, industrial, or professional activities.

Positive Abstractions

Conceptual ideals or values that are perceived as beneficial or constructive to individuals or society.