Can a Measure Be Reliable but Not Valid? Explain

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Yes, a measure can be reliable but not valid. To understand this, it's important to differentiate between the concepts of reliability and validity in the context of research and measurement.

Reliability refers to the consistency of a measure. A reliable measure yields the same results upon repeated trials under the same conditions. For example, if you step on a scale several times in a row, and it shows the same weight each time, the scale is demonstrating reliability.

Validity, on the other hand, refers to the accuracy of a measure, or the degree to which it measures what it is supposed to measure. A valid measure accurately reflects the concept or characteristic it is intended to assess.

Now, a measure can be reliable without being valid. This occurs when a measurement is consistent but not measuring what it is intended to measure. For instance, if you have a bathroom scale that is broken and always shows you weigh 150 pounds regardless of your actual weight, the scale is reliable (because it consistently shows 150 pounds every time you use it) but not valid (because it does not accurately reflect your true weight).

In contrast, a measure cannot be valid if it is not reliable. If a measure yields inconsistent results, we cannot be sure that it is accurately measuring the intended characteristic.

In summary, reliability is a necessary but not sufficient condition for validity. For a measure to be useful, it must be both reliable and valid. Researchers strive to use measures that are both consistent and accurate to ensure the credibility and applicability of their findings.

Can a Measure Be Reliable but Not Valid? Explain

Definitions: