Compare and Contrast the Traditional Realist View of National Security

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is The traditional realist view of national security focuses on the protection of a state's territory, sovereignty, and military power. It emphasizes the importance of maintaining a strong military and using force to protect national interests. This view is often based on the assumption that the international system is inherently competitive and that states must prioritize their own security above all else.

On the other hand, the liberal view of human security takes a broader approach, emphasizing the protection of individuals and communities from a wide range of threats, including poverty, disease, environmental degradation, and political repression. This view prioritizes the well-being and rights of people, and it often advocates for international cooperation and the promotion of human rights as essential components of security.

While these two views of security may seem contradictory on the surface, they can also be complementary. The realist focus on military strength can provide a necessary deterrent against external threats, while the liberal emphasis on human security can address the root causes of conflict and instability, ultimately reducing the need for military intervention.

In my opinion, the view of security that should be paramount is the liberal view of human security. While traditional realist concerns about military power and national sovereignty are important, they should be balanced with a broader understanding of security that prioritizes the well-being and rights of individuals and communities. By addressing the root causes of insecurity and promoting human rights, we can create a more stable and peaceful world for all.

Compare and Contrast the Traditional Realist View of National Security

Definitions: