Compare and Contrast Both Self-Defense and Necessity

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Self-defense and necessity are both legal defenses that can be used in certain situations to justify actions that would otherwise be considered unlawful.

Self-defense is the use of force to protect oneself from an imminent threat of violence. It is based on the principle that individuals have the right to protect themselves from harm. In order to successfully claim self-defense, the force used must be proportionate to the threat and must be used to prevent imminent harm.

For example, a scenario that would justify the use of self-defense could be a situation where a person is being physically attacked by an assailant and uses force to defend themselves and prevent further harm.

Necessity, on the other hand, is the use of force or other unlawful actions in order to prevent a greater harm from occurring. It is based on the principle that sometimes breaking the law is necessary in order to prevent a more serious harm from occurring. In order to successfully claim necessity, the harm being prevented must be greater than the harm caused by the unlawful action.

For example, a scenario that would justify the use of necessity could be a situation where a person breaks into a building in order to save someone who is trapped inside and in immediate danger.

In conclusion, while both self-defense and necessity are legal defenses that can justify the use of force or other unlawful actions, they are based on different principles and are used in different circumstances. Self-defense is used to protect oneself from imminent harm, while necessity is used to prevent a greater harm from occurring.

Compare and Contrast Both Self-Defense and Necessity

Definitions: