Contrast Teleological and Deontological Ethics

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Teleological ethics, also known as consequentialist ethics, focuses on the outcomes or consequences of actions. This means that the morality of an action is determined by the potential good or bad results it may produce. The key guiding principle of teleological ethics is the idea that the end justifies the means, meaning that as long as the outcome is positive, the action is morally acceptable. Examples of systems of ethics associated with teleological ethics include utilitarianism, which seeks to maximize overall happiness or pleasure, and ethical egoism, which prioritizes the individual's own self-interest.

On the other hand, deontological ethics, also known as non-consequentialist ethics, focuses on the inherent rightness or wrongness of actions themselves, regardless of their consequences. The key guiding principle of deontological ethics is the idea that certain actions are inherently right or wrong, and must be followed or avoided regardless of the potential outcomes. Examples of systems of ethics associated with deontological ethics include Kantian ethics, which emphasizes the importance of following moral duties and obligations based on rational principles, and divine command theory, which asserts that moral obligations are derived from a higher power or divine authority.

In summary, teleological ethics evaluates the morality of actions based on their outcomes, while deontological ethics evaluates the morality of actions based on their inherent rightness or wrongness. These two ethical approaches offer different perspectives on how to determine what is morally right or wrong, and have different implications for decision-making and moral reasoning.

Contrast Teleological and Deontological Ethics

Definitions: