Boxill Uses the Cases of Tom, Dick, and Harry to Argue

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Boxill's argument for reparations for Black Americans is based on the idea that historical injustices and systemic discrimination have led to a significant wealth gap between Black and white Americans. He uses the cases of Tom, Dick, and Harry to illustrate this point.

Tom represents the historical injustices of slavery and Jim Crow laws, which systematically oppressed and exploited Black Americans for centuries. Dick represents the ongoing systemic discrimination and barriers to economic and educational opportunities that continue to disproportionately affect Black communities. And Harry represents the current wealth disparity between Black and white Americans, with the average white family having significantly more wealth than the average Black family.

Boxill argues that because white Americans have benefited from these historical injustices and ongoing systemic discrimination, they have a moral obligation to provide reparations to Black Americans in the form of financial compensation, educational and economic opportunities, and other forms of support to help address the wealth gap and systemic inequalities.

Whether or not one finds this argument convincing is a matter of personal perspective. Some may argue that reparations are necessary to address the historical and ongoing injustices faced by Black Americans and to help level the playing field. Others may argue that reparations are not the most effective way to address these issues and that other forms of systemic change and support would be more impactful.

Ultimately, the question of reparations for Black Americans is a complex and contentious issue that requires careful consideration of historical context, systemic inequalities, and the moral and ethical obligations of society.

Boxill Uses the Cases of Tom, Dick, and Harry to Argue

Definitions: