Nathanson Argues That an Adequate System of Punishment Could Never

question 1120

Multiple Choice

Nathanson argues that an adequate system of punishment could never be designed purely on the basis of "an eye for an eye" principles because:

• A) There is no objective way to rank the severity of different types of criminal activity.
• B) They focus too strongly on the motivations and underlying intentions of the criminal.
• C) They offer no plausible guidance on how to punish many types of criminal activity.
• D) They wrongly focus on the contexts of particular crimes, rather than on types of crime.

---

Definitions:

Consumer Purchases

Transactions in which individuals buy goods and services for personal use, reflecting consumer spending habits and economic health.

Elasticity

A measure in economics that shows how the quantity demanded or supplied of a good changes in response to a change in price.

Inferior Good

A type of good for which demand decreases as the income of consumers increases, as opposed to normal goods, where demand increases with income.

Normal Good

A good for which demand increases as the income of consumers increases.