G. E. Moore: Principia Ethica

question 1

Essay

G. E. Moore: Principia Ethica
According to G. E. Moore, the fundamental task of moral philosophy is to provide a definition of goodness. In seeking a definition, Moore is not simply trying to discover what it is that most people mean when they say the word good, nor does he aim to stipulate his own novel definition. Rather, he seeks to give an account of the nature of goodness by analyzing the concept in terms of its component parts, much as one might define bachelor as an unmarried man. According to Moore, however, "good" cannot be defined in this sense. This is because the concept of goodness is simple-it has no parts. Moore claims that in this respect "good" is like "yellow": You cannot explain what the concept is to someone who does not already know it.
Moore argues that many previous philosophers have failed to recognize this point, and in doing so have committed what he calls the naturalistic fallacy, the mistake of believing that goodness is identical to some natural property, such as happiness or that which we desire. (Elsewhere, Moore uses a discipline definition of "natural" as a property that is appropriately studied by those working on the natural sciences.) Against any such identity claim, Moore deploys what has become known as the open question argument. For any proposed definition of good, Moore claims, it is always sensible to ask whether things of that sort are good. For instance, the question "Is pleasure good?" appears to be a perfectly sensible question to ask - it is an open question. In contrast, the question "Is pleasure pleasant?" is trivial - it is a closed question. According to Moore, this proves that goodness and pleasure cannot be the same thing. Moore holds that this test can be used to disqualify any proposed definition of goodness, and thus goodness cannot be identical with any natural property.
-What does Moore claim is "the most fundamental question in all Ethics"? What is his answer to this question and how does he argue for it? Do you find his position to be plausible? Why or why not?

---

Definitions:

Free-Ride

A situation in which an individual benefits from resources, goods, or services without contributing to the cost.

Private Markets

Markets where transactions occur directly between parties without public exchange involvement, often characterized by less regulation.

Socially Optimal Level

A state of resource allocation where the benefits to society are maximized, considering all externalities.

Excise Tax

A tax levied on specific goods or services, such as alcohol, tobacco, and gasoline, usually to discourage their use or to generate revenue.