Examlex
R. M. Hare: Freedom and Reason
Hare argues that moral judgments are universalizable and prescriptive. That is, he claims that to genuinely make a moral judgment, one must be willing to universalize that judgment-if you claim that another person ought not do x, you must also be willing to admit that you ought not do x if faced with the same circumstances. Furthermore, he maintains that moral judgments are characteristically prescriptive, such that making the judgment "I ought to do x" involves (among other things) accepting the prescription "Let me do x."
Given these two features of moral judgments, Hare develops a theory of moral reasoning that parallels scientific reasoning. Like scientific reasoning, moral reasoning involves assessing general principles by attempting to falsify their particular consequences. While scientific hypotheses can be falsified only by actual observations, however, Hare claims that moral principles can be reasonably rejected on the basis of merely supposed cases. Thus, to test the principle "creditors always ought to imprison their debtors," we need not find a case that contradicts the principle; it is sufficient if we can imagine a case in which a creditor ought not to imprison a debtor.
In Hare's view, moral reasoning involves four necessary ingredients: (i) a knowledge of all the relevant facts of the case, (ii) an appreciation of the logical framework provided by the constraints of universalizability and prescriptivity, (iii) a set of inclinations, and (iv) the power to imagine what it is like to be in the shoes of others. To discover what we morally ought to do, we must ask whether we would be able to universalize the principles we are inclined to accept. Hare concludes by considering how one might try to escape from the type of moral arguments he advocates. He concludes that although we can often rationally persuade others to adopt our moral views, it might be impossible, even in principle, to do so when dealing with people who have very unusual inclinations.
-Hare maintains that morality provides protection for those who refrain from making moral judgments.
Literacy Tests
Tests that were historically used as a voting qualification tool in the United States, designed to disenfranchise certain groups, particularly African Americans.
Federal Voting Age
The legal age set by federal law at which individuals are entitled to vote in elections, currently 18 years in the United States.
Southern Resistance
Describes the opposition and defiance by entities in the southern United States against federal laws, policies, or societal changes, especially regarding civil rights and racial segregation.
Campaign Promises
Commitments made by politicians to voters during their campaigns for office, outlining what they intend to accomplish if they get elected.
Q3: When a person acts dutifully toward others
Q7: Smart claims that when we perform the
Q8: Mill claims that justice picks out certain
Q10: What is the principle of redress, and
Q13: Annas argues that we should think of
Q19: What nonmoral ideals does Wolf endorse, and
Q29: Explain Nietzsche's account of the nature of
Q29: According to the "battle citation" model of
Q29: Dewey maintains that the measure of the
Q31: According to Hume, human sympathy:<br>A) extends equally