Examlex
Philippa Foot: Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives
The distinction between categorical and hypothetical imperatives plays a key role in Kant's moral philosophy. Kant conceived of imperatives as statements about what one ought to do. Whereas hypothetical imperatives tell us we ought to act a certain way if we are to achieve a certain end that we desire, categorical imperatives state that we ought to do something regardless of whatever ends we happen to have. Kant held that moral requirements are categorical imperatives. On the face of it, common opinion seems to agree, for you cannot refute the claim that you morally ought to do something simply by pointing out that doing so would not satisfy your desires.
Foot argues that Kant was mistaken about this, and that moral requirements are in fact hypothetical imperatives. She begins by pointing out that as a matter of language, the imperatives of etiquette are also nonhypothetical - such norms do not fail to apply to people simply because they do not care about etiquette. Although the norms of etiquette apply to us regardless of our desires and interests, however, they cannot give us reasons to act independently of our desires and interests. Foot claims that we should think of moral requirements in the same way. In her view, those who reject morality are not necessarily behaving irrationally, for to act irrationally is to act in a way that defeats one's own purposes, and acting immorally need not involve any such self-defeat.
Foot realizes that some people will claim that her thesis is destructive of morality, and will argue that truly moral actions must be done "because they are right." Foot denies this view of morality, arguing that one can act morally simply out of a desire to helps one's fellow humans, or from a desire to be an honest and just person. Instead of seeing morality as demanding things of us independently of our aims, Foot recommends that we see ourselves as "volunteers banded together to fight for liberty and justice and against inhumanity and oppression."
-Foot recommends that we:
Profit
The financial gain obtained when the amount of revenue gained from a business activity exceeds the expenses, costs, and taxes needed to sustain the activity.
Price
The sum of money anticipated, demanded, or provided as compensation for something.
Long-run Equilibrium
A state in which economic forces such as supply and demand are balanced, and all adjustments to economic conditions have been made, often characterized by firms earning normal profit in perfectly competitive markets.
Short-run Equilibrium
A state where supply and demand are balanced at a particular price level within a short-term period, with at least one fixed input.
Q3: The "emotive meaning" of a term is:<br>A)
Q4: An action has deliberative justification if and
Q10: What is the "control condition" on moral
Q14: Hare claims that ethics and science are
Q18: Ayer claims that a synthetic proposition is
Q18: According to Nietzsche, the values of "good"
Q21: According to Ayer, all ethical concepts are
Q22: Prichard claims that moral philosophy rests on
Q22: How does Foot respond to the objection
Q30: External reasons are reasons that exist regardless