Examlex
J. L. Mackie: Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong
Mackie's position, which he calls "moral skepticism" but has come to be more commonly known as "the error theory," involves two central claims. First, Mackie claims that ordinary moral discourse contains a "claim to objectivity." When someone makes a moral claim-e.g., that abortion is immoral-they do not mean to merely express their feelings or issue a command. Rather, they are seeking to describe an intrinsic feature of the action in question-in this case, that abortion is objectively the sort of thing that ought not to be done. Second, Mackie claims that objective moral values do not exist. It follows from these two theses that all moral claims are false.
Mackie gives two main arguments for his claim that objective values do not exist. The Argument from Relativity maintains that variation in moral judgments, both between individuals and between societies, is best explained by the hypothesis that moral judgments reflect ways of life rather than objective moral facts. If so, Mackie claims, there is good reason to believe that moral facts do not exist. The second argument, the Argument from Queerness, has two parts, one metaphysical and one epistemological. Metaphysically, if objective values did exist, they would be completely unlike anything else in the universe, in that they would give us reasons for action independently of what we happen to desire or aim at. Epistemologically, if such values existed, they would have to be known by some special faculty of intuition, completely different from our other ways of knowing about the world. Because it is implausible that such strange facts or faculties exist, Mackie claims, we should accept that no objective values exist. Mackie concludes with a brief discussion of how people could come to believe in objective values, despite their non-existence.
-According to Mackie's use of the term, a "moral skeptic" is someone who:
Extinction Procedure
A behavioral psychology technique involving the discontinuation of reinforcements for a certain behavior, leading to its reduction or elimination.
Reinforced
Strengthened or made more effective through added support, material, or structure.
Eliminated
Refers to the removal or deletion of something, making it no longer present or effective.
Identified
Recognized or discovered to be a certain person or thing.
Q3: Sinnott-Armstrong admits that even if some confirmation
Q11: Unlike utilitarianism, contractualism denies that considerations of
Q12: Impersonal reasons, according to Scanlon, do not
Q13: Held argues that the public/private distinction has
Q13: In contrast to utilitarianism, contractualism:<br>A) rejects well-being
Q14: Singer claims that his principle is unprecedented
Q14: Harman claims that facts about the average
Q15: Thomas emphasizes how teaching does not only
Q24: Explain Held's criticisms of atomistic views of
Q26: How might some of the issues Regan