James Rachels: Active and Passive Euthanasia

question 17

True/False

James Rachels: Active and Passive Euthanasia
Active euthanasia is the intentional termination of a patient's life by another person, for the sake of relieving the pain and suffering of the patient. Passive euthanasia is the cessation of medical assistance needed to prolong a patient's life, again performed for the sake of relieving pain and suffering. The conventional doctrine in medical ethics is that whereas passive euthanasia is sometimes morally permissible, active euthanasia never is. Rachels argues that the conventional doctrine faces serious objections, and cannot be correct.
Rachels raises two objections to the conventional doctrine. The first is that the purpose of euthanasia is to alleviate pain and suffering, and in many cases active euthanasia can serve this function much more efficiently than passive euthanasia. Thus, if a decision has been made to employ euthanasia, active euthanasia is preferable to passive euthanasia. Rachels's second objection is that the conventional doctrine leads to decisions about life and death being made on morally irrelevant grounds. For example, passive euthanasia is sometimes employed on infants born with Down's syndrome who would require a simple surgery to survive. Such infants are allowed to die not because they require surgery, but because they have Down's syndrome. The decision to euthanize such infants depends on the irrelevant fact that they require a simple operation.
The acceptance of the conventional doctrine is often grounded in the view that killing is intrinsically worse than letting die. Against this, Rachels imagines two cases that are exactly alike in every respect, except that one involves killing and the other involves letting die. In the first case, Smith drowns his young cousin to gain his inheritance. In the second case, Jones, like Smith, intends to kill his young cousin, but ends up (because of a slippery bath tub) merely watching him drown. Rachels claims that the two men behave equally wrongly, and that this shows there is no morally relevant distinction between killing and letting die. The distinction between killing and letting die thus cannot be used to support the conventional doctrine
-Rachels argues that the conventional doctrine leads to decisions concerning life and death made on irrelevant grounds.

Recognize the economic and legislative changes driven by the Civil War and their long-term impacts on American society.

Understand the socioeconomic and political factors that led to internal conflicts within the Confederacy.

Recognize the strategies and policies implemented by the Union and Confederacy during the Civil War.

Comprehend the motivations and rhetoric used by leaders like Jefferson Davis and Abraham Lincoln to rally support for the war effort.

---

Definitions:

Verbs and Gerunds

Verbs express action or state of being, while gerunds are verbs in their -ing form functioning as nouns in a sentence.

Parallelism

The use of components in a sentence that are grammatically the same or similar in construction, sound, meaning, or meter.

Background Check

The process of looking into a person's or organization's history to verify credentials or assess the reliability and integrity.

Credit History

A record of a borrower's responsible repayment of debts.