Examlex
Peter Singer: Famine, Affluence, and Morality
Every year, natural and human disasters leave millions of people in dire need of help. Many people regard providing assistance to the victims of these disasters as an act of charity-something that is good to do, but that it is not wrong to refrain from doing. Singer argues that this is mistaken, and that nearly all of us are obligated to do far more to alleviate suffering around the globe. Singer's argument begins with two simple assumptions. The first is that suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are bad. The second is the moral principle that "if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it." From these two assumptions, Singer claims, it follows that nearly all of us should be giving far more of our money to famine relief, and that spending this money on morally insignificant purchases (such as new clothes) is immoral.
Singer addresses several objections to his view. The first objection is this: because the suffering caused by famine would be alleviated if all affluent people were to contribute a relatively small amount, no single person can be required to contribute more than a modest sum. Singer allows that if everyone were to contribute to famine relief, no one would be obligated to contribute large sums of money. Because this is almost certain not to happen, however, Singer insists that we ought to do what we can to prevent suffering, provided that doing so will not involve sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance. The second objection maintains that Singer's view requires a substantial revision to our moral scheme, and requires us to make large sacrifices in our own well-being. Singer admits these consequences, but denies that they constitute legitimate objections. It might simply be the case that morality is very demanding. Further, Singer argues that his conclusion follows from the simple assumptions from which he begins; so, unless one has reason to doubt his assumptions or the soundness of his reasoning, one must accept his conclusion.
-Singer claims that his principle:
Wilhelm Wundt
A German psychologist who is considered the father of experimental psychology; he founded the first psychology laboratory in 1879.
Psychological Science
The study of mind and behavior through research and experimentation, encompassing various disciplines such as cognitive, social, and developmental psychology.
Psychiatrist
A medical doctor specialized in diagnosing, treating, and preventing mental health disorders.
Medical Doctor
A qualified practitioner of medicine who diagnoses and treats diseases, injuries, and other physical and mental impairments.
Q1: According to Rachels, all ethical egoists are
Q2: What is Sisyphus condemned to do? What
Q9: Arpaly claims that a sorrowing philanthropist is
Q9: What is Thomson's final verdict on abortion?
Q13: According to Nagel, some people find the
Q13: What policy recommendations does Davis give to
Q21: According to Hanson, one concern about affirmative
Q28: According to Shue, an unequal distribution of
Q29: Sartre claims that everything is permissible if
Q31: Marquis claims that Thomson's argument succeeds in