Examlex
Travis Timmerman: A Reply to Singer
In "A Reply to Singer," Travis Timmerman examines Peter's Singer argument for the claim that we are morally obligated to donate most of our expendable income to aid organizations. Timmerman focuses on the second premise of Singer's argument (which states that if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable importance, we ought, morally, to do it) , and argues (i) that Singer fails to justify the truth of this premise and (ii) that there are positive reasons to reject it.
Singer's defense of his second premise rests on the famous "Drowning Child" thought experiment. According to Singer, our intuitive moral reaction to this thought experiment-that it is wrong not to save the life of a drowning child at the expense of new clothes-shows that we already accept the truth of his premise, at least implicitly. Timmerman disagrees. Because we rarely, if ever, find ourselves in the position Singer describes, our intuitive reaction to the "Drowning Child" case is informed, according to Timmerman, by the implicit assumption that it describes an anomalous, one-off event. Timmerman then points out that an intuitive conviction that it is wrong not to make a single, one-time monetary sacrifice to save the life of a child is not the same as, nor does it entail, the belief that we are obligated to spend our entire lives repeatedly making similar sacrifices, as Singer's premise requires of people in situations like ours. Singer's attempt to justify his second premise-by showing that our moral intuitions reveal we already accept it-therefore fails on Timmerman's view.
Timmerman next argues that if we consider a more relevant analogy ("Drowning Children") , in which a person is in a position to save many drowning children everyday over the course of her entire life at comparably insignificant personal cost, our moral intuitions actually conflict with Singer's second premise. Timmerman therefore concludes that not only do our commonsense moral intuitions fail to support Singer's second premise, they also reveal that people positively reject the truth of the premise.
-Singer defends the second premise of his argument by appeal to:
Period Of The Zygote
Approximately a 2-week period from the time of fertilization of a human ovum by a sperm to the time of implantation in the uterine wall.
Period Of The Fetus
Lasting from the ninth week of gestation until birth, the time of rapid growth and further differentiation when the reproductive system forms, gains in body weight occur, and the brain and nervous system continue to develop.
Chromosomes
Structures made of DNA and proteins that contain the genetic information of an organism.
Teratogens
Agents that can cause developmental abnormalities or birth defects in a developing fetus when exposed to the mother.
Q14: Annas argues the problem of the vagueness
Q15: According to Thomson's Fourth Principle, A may
Q16: On Thomson's view, if a human being
Q18: In Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania (2003), the Court
Q19: Thomson notes that the bystander does not
Q25: Ethical egoism is the view that:<br>A) all
Q27: According to Shue, the main beneficiaries of
Q28: Held claims that once gender bias is
Q31: According to Thomson, one way to test
Q31: According to economic theories of value, animal