Examlex
Thomas Nagel: Death
Suppose that death is the permanent end of human existence. If so, is death bad for the person who dies? Some argue that such a claim is senseless, on the grounds that nothing can be bad for a person who no longer exists. Nagel rejects these arguments, and defends the view that death is bad for us. In Nagel's view, death is not bad because of any of the positive features of death, but because it deprives us of the goods that life contains. Nagel defends his view from three objections.
The first objection is based on the assumption that nothing can be good or bad for someone unless it is experienced as pleasant or unpleasant. Because the dead do not experience anything, it seems that death cannot be bad for us. Nagel responds by denying the assumption behind the objection. We can be harmed by people betraying us behind our backs and without our knowledge, and we can even be harmed by people neglecting our wishes after our deaths.
The second objection is that death cannot be bad for a person, because after death there is simply no subject for which anything can be good or bad. In response, Nagel claims that it would be bad for a person to be reduced to the cognitive level of an infant, even if he remained perfectly content. The badness of such a fate is not undermined by the contention that the original person no longer exists, for the badness is grounded in the contrast between what actually transpired and possible alternatives. Such a fate is bad because it deprives a person of potential goods. Nagel claims that death is similar in this respect.
The third, and final, objection is this: because we were not harmed by our prenatal nonexistence, we cannot be harmed by posthumous nonexistence. Nagel responds that although our nonexistence before our birth did not deprive us of anything, death deprives us of time that we would otherwise be alive. Ultimately, then, Nagel concludes that these three objections fail to undermine the thought that death is bad for us.
-Nagel claims that if people can be frozen without reduction of their conscious lifespan, it will be inappropriate:
Interest Payment
Interest Payment is the payment made to a lender by a borrower, representing the charge for the privilege of borrowing money.
Current Ratio
A liquidity ratio that measures a company's ability to cover its short-term obligations with its current assets.
Interest Bearing
A term indicating that a financial instrument or account accrues interest over time, such as a loan, bond, or savings account.
Note Payable
A written promise to pay a certain amount of money on a specific future date, representing a liability for the issuer.
Q1: Mandatory death penalty statutes made the death
Q3: In 1989, Kevin Wiggins was convicted of
Q4: Singer defends the second premise of his
Q8: Racial profiling conducted by police officers continues
Q11: Crouch claims that from the perspective of
Q13: In Bell v. Cone (2002), the Court
Q16: Midgley claims that we fully understand our
Q21: The narrow exceptions to the AEDPA also
Q21: Who articulated the notion of sensationalism?<br>A) Thomas
Q28: In Rachels's case of Smith and Jones:<br>A)