In This Article Edwards Attacks the Cosmological Argument, Specifically Aquinas's

question 5

True/False

In this article Edwards attacks the cosmological argument, specifically Aquinas's causal and contingency versions, holding that the argument fails at several points. Against the causal argument, he argues that the premise asserting the impossibility of an infinite series is false. Even if the argument were sound, he says, it would not prove the existence of a single first cause because a plurality of causes cannot be ruled out. Furthermore, the argument is not helped by the theist's distinction between causes that bring something into existence (causes in fieri) and causes that sustain something in existence (causes in esse). Some defend the causal argument by insisting that even if there were an infinite series of causes, there still must be an ultimate cause of the series as a whole. Edwards counters that such notions rest on the "erroneous assumption that the series is something over and above the members of which it is composed." Against the contingency argument, Edwards maintains that to explain a contingent phenomenon, we do not need to posit a necessary being and that those who make such a demand beg the question at issue.
-Paley's argument, if cogent, proves that the designer of the world has infinite wisdom.

---

Definitions:

Stakeholders

Individuals or groups that have an interest, investment, or stake in a project, business, or decision, and who may be impacted by its outcome.

Analyzing and Interpreting

This refers to the process of examining data or information to extract meaning or insights, often by identifying patterns or underlying themes.

Codifying

The process of systematically arranging and setting down laws, rules, principles, or procedures in a coherent system.